Showing posts with label PCC. Show all posts
Showing posts with label PCC. Show all posts

Thursday, 17 March 2011

Case Studies:

1: Man vs Northwich Guardian
  • Clause 6 applies as the boy is 15 years old and could be protected.
  • Public right to know takes priority as it is a serious crime.
  • Boy has already posted video on YouTube - so right to privacy is gone.
  • Complaint withdrawn.
2: Man vs Zoo Magazine
  • Clause 6 applies as child is 10 years old. 
  • Potential ridicule of girl by magazine is intruding on childs life.
  • Child's face should be blurred, for the sake of child.
  • However, man sounds as if he is trying to cover up for bad parenting.
  • Complaint stands.
3: Man vs Sunday Times
  • Clause 4 applies as it could be seen as harrassment of the child.
  • Clause 6 applies as the boy is only 14 and the reporter is not only harrassing a child, but attempting to obtain photos of another child without the schools permission.
  • Complaint stands.
4: Women vs The Independent
  • Clause 3 applies as the article is an intrusion into the women's private life.
  • Not public information as the theatre has official press releases which should be adheared to.
  • Complaint stands.
5: Women vs The Sun
  • Clause 5 applies as it could be intrusion into grief and shock.
  • However, paper insists that it did not treat the death inappropriately.
  • Incident happened in public place with many onlookers.
  • Complaint withdrawn.
6: Women vs Eastbourne Gazette
  • Clause 4 applies as the reporter is harrassing the family and the man.
  • Clause 8 applies as the reporter is clearly ignoring the fact that he must have permission from hospital authority to see the patient let alone try to ask them questions.
  • Complaint stands.
7: Police Officer vs Sunday Telegraph
  • Clause 10 applies as the paper admitted to subterfuge.
  • Clause 3 applies as the issue is one about the policewoman's right to privacy, which clearly wasn't respected.
  • However, it may be argued that the public have a right to know as a result of the position she holds within the local society.
  • Arguement withdrawn.
8: Paul McCartney vs Hello! Magazine
  • Clause 3 applies as the issue regards his right to privacy.
  • However he is a celebrity in a very public place and so cannot expect privacy.
  • Clause 5 applies as it is intrusion into grief of his wifes death.
  • This should have been treated respectfully be the press.
  • Complaint stands.

Monday, 7 March 2011

PCC: Overview

What does the PCC do?
  • The Press Complaints Commission (PCC) is an independent self-regulatory body which deals with complaints about the editorial content of newspapers and magazines (and their websites). 
  • They use the 16 clauses as their guidlines.
  • The PCC will investigate when they receive a complaint by someone directly affected.
  • The PCC will attempt to help the editor and complainant to agree on a way to resolve the issue, such as a published apology or clarification.
How does the system work?
  • The system is not a legal one, but rather a voluntary agreement between editors.
  • The 16 clauses which act as guidlines are drawn up by a group of editors.
  • Non of the PCC staff are connected to the industry.
What does the code of practice cover?
  • An editor is expected to take responsibility for all the stories and photographs that appear in their publication and to ensure that they comply with the code.
  • The code does not cover issues of taste and decency. This is because the PCC recognises that in a democratic society we have the right to free press.
  • However, people can choose which newspaper is to their tastes, so with advertising such as billboards, then matters of taste and decency apply more.
How is the PCC funded?
  • Funded through the Press Standards Board of Finance (aka PressBof), which is responsible for collecting money from newspapers and magazines in the UK.
  • Newspapers and magazines pay a sum proportional to their papers circulation - so big newspapers pay much more than small local papers.
  • PCC does not receive any money from government.
History of the PCC:
  • The PCC was set up in 1991 and replaced the Press Council, which had been set up in 1953.
  • During the 1980s, a small number of publications failed to observe the basic ethics of journalism, and many MPs lost condfidence in the Press Council.
  • So the PCC was set up to prove "that non-statutory regulation can be made to work effectively".
Who complains to the PCC and what about?
  • The PCC will acept complaints from anyone who thinks an article involving them breaches the code in some way.
  • A number of celebrities have used the PCC's service in recent years, but most complaints are from odinary people. (In 2007, 95.8% came from odinary members of the public.)
  • The code provides special attention to particularly vunerable groups such as children, hospital patients and minority groups.
Why is the PCC important?
  • In a democratic society, we should have the right to free press, so the press should not subject to control by the law or govenrment.
  • The PCC is independant and voluntary to ensure this.
  • The PCC still protects the public, and is fast and free.

Sunday, 6 March 2011

PCC: 16 Clauses

Accuracy
Opportunity to reply
*Privacy
*Harassment
Intrusion into grief or shock
*Children

*Children in sex cases
*Hospitals
*Reporting of Crime
*Clandestine devices and subterfuge

Victims of sexual assault

Discrimination

Financial journalism
Confidential sources
Witness payments in criminal trials
*Payment to criminals


The public interest

There may be exceptions to the clauses marked * where they can be demonstrated to be in the public interest.